Perpustakaan Universitas Padjajaran
Pencarian Spesifik

Detail Cantuman

No image available for this title

Skripsi  

STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BALE BANDUNG REG. PERKARA NO.478/PID.SUS/2016/PN.BLB TENTANG DENGAN SENGAJA DAN TANPA HAK MENGIRIMKAN INFORMASI DAN DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK YANG BERISI ANCAMAN KEKERASAN ATAU MENAKUTNAKUTI YANG DITUJUKAN SECARA PRIBADI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KESUSILAAN (VIDE PASAL 29 JO. PASAL 45 AYAT (3) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008

In this case study, the authors raised the issue of the crime of
delivery of information and electronic documents that contain threats of

  • CodeCallNoLokasiKetersediaan
    050/2017050/2017Perpustakaan Mochtar Kusumaatmadja FH UnpadTersedia
  • Perpustakaan
    Fakultas Hukum
    Judul Seri
    -
    No. Panggil
    050/2017
    Penerbit Fakultas Hukum UNPAD : Bandung.,
    Deskripsi Fisik
    xiii, 76 hal, 30 cm.
    Bahasa
    Indonesia
    ISBN/ISSN
    -
    Klasifikasi
    050/2017
    Tipe Isi
    -
    Tipe Media
    -
    Tipe Pembawa
    -
    Edisi
    -
    Subyek
    DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK
    Info Detil Spesifik
    -
    Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
  • In this case study, the authors raised the issue of the crime of
    delivery of information and electronic documents that contain threats of
    violence and / or scare personally between the defendant Eddy Soemarto
    with Victim Anna Katarina. The defendant was legally send a short
    message containing the information and electronic documents that contain
    threats of violence and / or scare by a judge and sentenced to
    imprisonment for two (2) years and a fine of Rp.1.000.000.000 (one billion
    rupiah). This study was made with the purpose of reviewing juridically of
    Bale Bandung District Court Judge verdict Number
    478/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Blb.
    This study uses descriptive analytical research with normative
    juridical approach is an approach that emphasizes on legal norms to study
    literature by researching library materials and secondary data. The data
    were then analyzed by qualitative juridical methods.
    Based on the analysis, two conclusions can be drawn. Firstly,
    Decision Bale Bandung District Court Judge Number
    478/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Blb is not appropriate based on the Article 64
    paragraph (1) Criminal Code then, consideration of the judge in the court
    judgment must include Article 64 paragraph (1) Criminal Code are fulfilled
    by the defendant in the action continues, Second, the imposition of
    imprisonment for two (2) years and a fine of Rp.1.000.000.000 (one billion
    rupiah) to be replaced with one (1) month imprisonment is not appropriate
    based on the principle of proportionality in sentencing purposes that could
    lead to new crimes similar , raises new perpetrators and the absence of
    the process of educating the convict to get better before being returned to
    the public and requires the value scale to weigh and assess the severity of
    crime associated with criminal acts.

  • Tidak tersedia versi lain

  • Silakan login dahulu untuk melihat atau memberi komentar.


//

Informasi